As someone who’s gone down the rabbit hole fairly deeply, the second film is more nuanced and detailed, so more satisfying to me. To MamaHen’s point: the first film is more bullet points and can sound propagandistic to the ideologically motivated, and therefore easier to dismiss. The evidence and accompanying references in film 2 make for a more nuanced experience. I’m thinking of the people I’d want to send them to and trying to predict what kind of reactions they will elicit. I expect I may have to say “yeah but watch the second film, it explains all that!”
These are both brilliant! I think video #2 (The Evidence) might be better as an intro. Video #1 (What's Going On?) is excellent but may be too big a red pill for your average normie to swallow.
As someone who’s gone down the rabbit hole fairly deeply, the second film is more nuanced and detailed, so more satisfying to me. To MamaHen’s point: the first film is more bullet points and can sound propagandistic to the ideologically motivated, and therefore easier to dismiss. The evidence and accompanying references in film 2 make for a more nuanced experience. I’m thinking of the people I’d want to send them to and trying to predict what kind of reactions they will elicit. I expect I may have to say “yeah but watch the second film, it explains all that!”
These are both brilliant! I think video #2 (The Evidence) might be better as an intro. Video #1 (What's Going On?) is excellent but may be too big a red pill for your average normie to swallow.